Legal

Who Helped Kill Patent Troll Reform In the Senate

19:38 Friday May 23, 2014

Democratic Senator from Vermont Patrick Leahy (R)
listens to Republican Senator from Iowa Chuck Grassley (L)
during a Senate Judiciary Committeehearing on immigration
reform legislation in the Hart Senate Office Building in
Washington DC, USA, 22 April 2013.

A bipartisan proposal to curb patent trolls was shelved by the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) Wednesday.

A legislative proposal to club patent trolls over the head is now on hold indefinitely after the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), shelved the idea Wednesday — much to the surprise of patent reform advocates.

The bipartisan compromise on patents was headed for a markup on Thursday. But Leahy suddenly took it off the table after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) intervened at the last minute, according to multiple people close to the negotiations.

The bill would have made it more difficult for patent holders to file frivolous lawsuits, adding new requirements that would force lawsuit losers to cover litigation costs for both sides and patent holders to state their accusations more explicitly. Among the proposal's supporters were leading tech companies that are often the target of patent trolls — a term of art for companies that make money by suing other companies for patent infringement, with the knowledge that the other companies would rather settle than go to court.

"I think it was a surprise in some ways that it didn't go forward," said Todd Dickinson, executive director of the American Intellectual Property Law Association. "All indicators this morning were that it was going to markup. But the time ran out."

As late as Wednesday morning, Leahy and the bill's two top shepherds — Sens. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) and Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) -- were said to have settled on the bill's language, saying, as one reform advocate put it, "pencils down."

"We thought we were good, and Cornyn thought we were good," said the advocate, who asked not to be named because the discussions were private. "Leahy's statement dropped publicly without any of the Republicans — including Cornyn — having a heads-up, which as you can imagine, has them a little pissed off."

Sure enough, Cornyn let loose with a testy statement, blaming Reid's move to block the proposal on pressure from unnamed lobbyists.

"This is the third time in three weeks the majority leader has blocked legislation with bipartisan support in the Senate," Cornyn said. "It’s disappointing the majority leader has allowed the demands of one special interest group to trump a bipartisan will in Congress and the overwhelming support of innovators and job creators."

The ranking Republican member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), echoed that sentiment, saying he was "surprised and disappointed that the Senate Democratic leadership is not willing to move forward."

Supporters of the compromise accuse trial lawyers, universities, pharmaceutical companies and biotech companies for foiling the plan at the eleventh hour. As late as Tuesday, the University of Vermont and a biotech coalition each sent letters to Leahy opposing the legislation.

"We believe the measures in the legislation … go far beyond what is necessary or desirable to combat abusive patent litigation, and would do serious damage to the patent system," reads one of the letters. "Many of the provisions would have the effect of treating every patent holder as a patent troll."

A Leahy spokeswoman acknowledged the uptick in correspondence in the hours before the deadline. But opponents have been clear about their feelings all along, so why would Leahy choose to shelve the bill now?

Passing the legislation out of committee would put greater pressure on Reid to bring it up for a floor vote, according to one industry stakeholder, which would put the Democratic leader at even more uncomfortable odds with the groups that wanted him to sink the bill.

"He'd be put in an even tougher position with the trial bar," the stakeholder said, who also declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the negotiations. "He didn't want that."

Source: Washington Post

 

< Back

    Add your comment

    We aim to have healthy debate. But we won't publish comments that abuse others

    1200 characters left

     

     

    LATEST NEWS

     
      

    © copyright 2013 Website News. All rights reserved.

     

    SECTIONS

    ABOUT

    SUBSCRIBE

     

    Website News is for and about the website design, development, marketing industry. We will endeavor to bring you up-to-date news and information to help you in your work as well as give you useful information and tips for your clients and their businesses.

    We are always keen for you to submit any information you find from elsewhere, or about your business, that you feel will be relevant.

     

     

     

     

    Contact Us:

    For advertising enquiries or to submit a story, please email us at: editor@websitenews.co

     

    Login

    Website News

    Sign-up to Website News and create your universal Woogloo ID

    Your details

    Your login details

    Your address


    Is your address not being found?

    Company

    Company address

    Yes No


    To register on the Website News website you either need to use your
    exisitng Woogloo ID or create a new one (see below).

    Sign Up

    Why sign up?

    • Get access to Registered User's priviledges, which may include hidden pages, special features and special pricing, if they exist, on this website.
    • Get access to all sites powered by Woogloo V3 without having to enter your details everytime.

    Login Error

    Forgot your password?

    Enter your email address below and click 'Reset Password' Button




    What is a Woogloo ID

    Logging in...